Sunday, April 25, 2010

NO FREE TAP-INS FOR LINDEAN MEADOWS

First of all I want to say that I am in total support of the development of Linden Meadows. There was an article in the "Tribune" on 4/22/10 which explained that the Indiana Housing and Community Development Authority (IHCDA) will partner with a developer, Captains View LLC, to purchase and rehab 11 homes to resell.

This all sounded great until I read the part about the Sewer Board considering waiving the tap-in fees for these homes. The Sewer Board just received a large fee increase with another increase in two years. It is not fair to us, the citizens, to have an increase in our bills and watch a wealthy developer receive a free pass on the hook up fees.

The "Tribune" article also said that, "...the city will look to upgrade paving and drainage, as well as expand street lighting along Linden Meadows Court." The city will also "...implement a concentrated code enforcement sweep along Olive and Linden streets leading into Linden Meadows, and expedite the building permits and inspections for the development." This is a great gift to the developer in my eyes, this area needs better lighting and drainage and these steps will benefit the entire area around Linden Meadows. Enough is enough.

147 comments:

Anonymous said...

i agree shirley enough is enough! no more hand outs to the developer. this developer already is getting a sweet deal from the state.

geez..why cant we get concentrated code enforcement, better drainage, and better lighting throughout the city for which the city is actually responsible for instead of to just a private developer.

The New Albanian said...

Code enforcement. What a concept.

Anonymous said...

anyone know how many code citations have been issued this year and how many our attorney has actually prosecuted?

Anonymous said...

Here are the figures for the Beginning Balance 2010; Fiscal Year Ending 2009:

General Fund (Negative) $5,343,770.76

Sanitation/Operations (Negative)
$5,700,213.19

Parks & Recreation (Negative)
$330,314.81

TIF Industrial Park (Negative)
$1,130,019.12

We are $12 million in the red.

You may call Department Local Government & Finance

You may call Pat McLaughlin 949-9140.

This is not because taxes haven't been collected, etc.

You may also request from Kay Garry the year end "green bar report". These figures were printed in the Tribune newspaper end of February and were (are still?) available online from the Tribune.

Anonymous said...

More lies? No documents to show budget gap. Put up or shut up.

Anonymous said...

Any other solution at linden meadows would have cost the city a lot more money. Here are all the options-

1. Let houses sit there boarded up forever.

2. Demo houses at cost of about 100,000 dollars. Before you can demo them though, you have to pay off PNC, which makes that 600,000 cost. Just saying the CHDO should pay is a nice thought but isn't an option since it's insolvent.

3. Used federal funds (money that otherwise would go to another indiana town) to help developer pay off PNC's mortgage.


As for the "sweet heart deal," I don't call paying PNC half a million bucks for worthless houses that sweet heart. You can buy as much land and put in a road elsewhere for less than 200,000.

Also, if it were so damn sweetheart, why hasn't any other developer even looked at linden meadows in last year? Because it's a big, risky, expensive mess, that's why.

You might think street lights and sewer taps are costly, but they're cheaper by far than any other option the city has except just leaving the houses there as safety hazards and an eyesore for the neighbors FOREVER!

Anonymous said...

Go get the documents lazy. Pat got his own copy from DLGF. Do some work and quit bad mouthing people. Lazy. Want everyone else to do the work and hand it to you.

Anonymous said...

I want someone to give me the name of the developer who only does stuff for free. We need to hire THAT developer to do anything.

Anonymous said...

So I'm supposed to call the state and ask for every doc they have on New Albany?

How about you tell me date published, name of document and person who signed it. With that info I might have chance with state.

Anonymous said...

Typical F0S. You ask for evidence, you get an insult.

Anonymous said...

Nothing to do with FOS, lordy. End of the year report required to be published by the end of February. Simply ask the State or ask Pat for a copy of the year end annual report. The DLGF will know what you are asking for and will mail you one. Or, you can have Daniel or yourself look at the last two days in February and you will see the report take up a large portion of a legal. The Auditor will also have a copy because County can not do their report until they receive the City's. Thanks.

Anonymous said...

So I take it that tis doc's not on the web.

So I take it that F0S does not have a copy.

Something tells me that if Denhart had a smoking gun on England, she'd show everyone on the planet.

I bet this doc, if it existed, painted a very different picture then what so called CFA says.

B.W. Smith said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anonymous said...

So what if we have a copy? Can't mail it to you, can't key it in, how lazy are you? Gee Whiz. It has nothing to do with a smoking gun and everything to do with the shape our city is in. Get over it.

Anonymous said...

6:16 said
"2. Demo houses at cost of about 100,000 dollars. Before you can demo them though, you have to pay off PNC, which makes that 600,000 cost. Just saying the CHDO should pay is a nice thought but isn't an option since it's insolvent.

"As for the "sweet heart deal," I don't call paying PNC half a million bucks for worthless houses that sweet heart. You can buy as much land and put in a road elsewhere for less than 200,000."

PNC holds the note to the property, the city could have forced PNC into cleaning the property up. PNC is not insolvent!

It is a sweetheart deal when the state is giving the money to the developer for FREE to pay off the note with PNC.

This developer has received enough and the city should not be giving them more.

Anonymous said...

the state is basically bailing out the city for the mess the city allowed chdo to create by the city's failure to properly issue building permits, perform inspections and basic code enforcements.

Anonymous said...

OFF THE SUBJECT--

Someone should really call out the republican party on their website endorsing THEIR candidates for the school board in a non-partisan election. Just noticed it.

Anonymous said...

The CHDO's insolvent, they cannot pay anything. PNC will not sell for anything less than 500,000. Yes you can sue PNC to clean up houses BUT THAT TAKES YEARS in court. The neighbors don't want to wait years.

IF ANYONE KNOWS A DEVELOPER WILLING TO TAKE THIS THING OVER FOR LESS MONEY, TELL US WHO THAT DEVELOPER IS! The CHDO has been trying for over a year to get a developer in there but no takers. The city's not writing out a check for anything. Let's face it, this the best deal for the city.

Anonymous said...

I checked the results of the KDF marathon/mini-marathon for FOS staff members but did not find any. I also didn't find Harvey the Rabbit, Tinkerbell, The Tooth Fairy or any minority at a Tea Party.

Anonymous said...

So you checked the race results of the marathon and mini marathon. Can you please list all the members of Freedom of Speech and/or Citizens for Accountability?

What's that you say?

It seems like many of you know Ms. Denhart by name, but if you disagree with what she is doing why do you not put your name on these attacks or at least approach her and tell her so.

But then again, I guess you all are a bunch of cowards, at least she puts her name on Letters to the Editor and stands before the Council and states her facts and opinions.

Sounds like a double standard to me and many readers here.

Put up or shut up you cowards.

What's that old saying: Do as I say, not as I do.

Anonymous said...

The neighbors don't want CHDO "Linden Meadows" period.

Anonymous said...

The neighbors don't want CHDO "Linden Meadows" period.

then they should have bought the land a long time ago.

Anonymous said...

If FOS is proud of its staff members in the marathon, then they should should post a picture of the finishers!

Anonymous said...

So what if we have a copy? Can't mail it to you, can't key it in, how lazy are you?

I have you my email address. My mailbox it still empty. What? Don't have a computer?

Anonymous said...

FOS IS PROUD OF ITS MARATHON FINISHERS. HERE'S PICTURES OF TWO (ON RIGHT).

http://citymarathon.files.wordpress.com/2009/05/fmp3.jpg?w=399&h=500

Anonymous said...

Since you say you know who the runners are, why does anyone need to publish photo's?
List there names for all to see. But then again, you don't know, do you?
I didn't think so.

Anonymous said...

ANOTHER F.O.S. MARATHONER! WE'RE SO PROUD!

http://www.flickr.com/photos/nanyleon/4319968239/

Anonymous said...

Shirley,

Thank you for this article. I think one point in your post should be clarified, however. You said you liked the Linden Meadows story until you read about the Sewer Board considering the tap fee waiver. For the record, the Sewer Board has not considered waiving tap fees.

This is what the News-Tribune article said about Linden Meadows sewer taps:

In a letter to the developers, England said the New Albany Sewer Board would have to consider whether to waive tap-in fees for the houses.

Read the article. It does not say England said he would pursue sewer taps. It does not say England even supported sewer tap waivers by the sewer board. The article does not say the developers have asked the sewer board to waive them. The article didn't even say the developer was going to ask for fee waivers.

The article merely says that England cannot waive sewer tap fees. Right now, I cannot image the sewer board waiving any fees.

Anonymous said...

anyone know how many code citations have been issued this year and how many our attorney has actually prosecuted?

Most cities our size have at least four full time attorneys.

One man can't do it all. You want more laws enforced, you need more lawyers.

Anonymous said...

11 days and still no arrest

tick
tock
tick
tock

shirley baird said...

to Anon. 4/26 RE: Mayor England and tap-in fees. I did not say the Mayor was considering waiving tap-in fees. I did say the Sewer Dept. was evidently considering doing so otherwise it would not have been mentioned in the "Tribune".

Anonymous said...

Q

Who controls the sewer board?

A

Douglas B. England

Q

Who controls the following attorneys: Gibson,Fifer,Lorch?

A

Douglas B. England

Q

Who controls the following Boards: Redevelopement, Board of Works, Board of Zoning Appeals,Planning Commission, Economic Development Commission, Storm water Board and Historic Preservation?

A

Douglas B. England

Q

Who control the Police Department, Fire Department, Controller, Code Enforcement, Parks & Recreation, Building Commissioner, Street Department, Sewer Billing Department, Engineers, Developers and etc. (did I miss anyone?)

A

Douglas B. England

Now you wonder why our city is in the mess we are in.

nuff said.

Anonymous said...

Good point anonymous, So, now I have a question. Who approved the other three (free) hook ups?

Anonymous said...

I did say the Sewer Dept. was evidently considering doing so otherwise it would not have been mentioned in the "Tribune".

The Tribune article did not say the sewer board had been asked or is considering tap waivers. All the Tribune said it that England cannot do it.

Anonymous said...

My email box is still empty.

Do FOS "Staff" do ANYTHING other than run marathons?

If you have some information, share it! Email the document so we can read it with our own eyes.

Alan
a47150@hotmail.com

Anonymous said...

Who approved the other three (free) hook ups?

The sewer board did. Because with the three that had already been sold to families, the sewer board was asked, considered, and approved the request. Does anyone have any proof that something similar is going on with the rest of the Linden Meadows houses? Don't say the Tribune article because it doesn't say that. Any other proof? Didn't think so.

The New Albanian said...

Uproarious and side-splitting.

Douglas B. England controls the entire city -- every official, every board, every position of influence.

Consequently, the bravery of the heroic, outnumbered CFAs -- Erika and Li'l Stevie in the vanguard, like WWII commandos -- must be exaggerated and the propaganda enhanced.

Against tremendous odds, outnumbered CFA operatives fight to topple the kingpin! Watch as they ignite explosive audit revelations, then scamper down hidden plastic stumps like on Hogan's Heroes.

I'm laughing so hard I might puke, and I haven't even had a beer yet today.

The mayor holds every string, and has accomplished no more than he has? Give me a break, conspiracy fetishists.

Anonymous said...

Please make some effort and get the document from the sources listed. It was online with the Tribune. If you know the date now, last two days in Feb, please. Give it a break and do some work your self.

Anonymous said...

so much for citizen watchdog. won't share the info they supposedly have.

Anonymous said...

by the way, i've looked and looked and cannot find any such document.

you say it exists, fine. prove it.

or it is just another FOS/CFA lie?

Anonymous said...

CFA: I have the proof! England stole $5 million from the city! I have the proof. The state audit shows this! We're the citizen watchdog helping little people fight corruption.

CITIZEN: Oh my gosh! I don't want any crooks in office. I want to see this document so I know England is correct and we can go after him.

CFA: Citizen, you lazy b*st*rd. How dare you ask to see our documents? Go do your own d*mn homework and stop expecting us to do everything for you. You must be in England's pocket!

CITIZEN: I thought CFA was here to help little people, those who don't have resources or time to investigate this. I don't want a crook in office. If he's a crook, show us why so we can begin taking action now! Don't you have 30 staff members? Can't one take five minutes and email me the document? Can't one post it to your website? Can't you at least look in your file, and type in the name and date of the document? Can't you tell me the internet address where I can view it online? It will take me weeks to do this research. It will take you five minutes. Help me help you get this crook out. Why can't we show the evidence to everyone so there's no doubt?

CFA: You're the problem, citizen. Stop being lazy. How much did England pay you? Why do you need to see "evidence"? Hire your own staff of 30 people. Why should I email you the document? I don't want to keep this secret. I want everyone to know England's corrupt. I want everyone to see England's evil ways. But I'm not going to email it because...well...because...well....

Anonymous said...

From VOP's intro banner:

This blog is dedicated to all The Little People in New Albany. .... We can make a difference on the way our City Government operates. My philosophy is Common Sense and seeing things as they are, and doing things as they should be done.

Help the little people. Do what should be done. Share the information you have so everyone can know the truth.

Anonymous said...

My how we twist and turn the truth Who said England stole $5 mil It was stated this CITY which includes you and I are $5 million in thehole. Get the documwent yourself. Nobody is going to email anything to people they dont know. Do you know how you read and sound? You need to go after Coffey putting out the flier with no name talking about sewers and swimming pools. FOS isn't on this blog they have their own. Why cant you leave Shirley's alone? Because you have nothing better to do I guess. Ta Ta.

Anonymous said...

i take it no evidence. i emailed fos. i heard nothing. no proof as usual.

Anonymous said...

No evidence as to what, LOL? You are sick. FOS didnt print the year end financials so you need to get over it that someone else in town cares more than you do. You were given the avenues to retrieve the information but you choose not to. It'son you.

Anonymous said...

Get the documwent yourself. Nobody is going to email anything to people they dont know.

Why aren't you doing to email it to someone you don't know?

It's a government document, correct? It's not FOS's "secret" tapes. It's a government document, correct?

Prove it exists! Prove it, prove it, prove it!!!!!!!!!!

WHAT ARE YOU HIDING?

Anonymous said...

Either pay for it yourself, get it from the Auditor or get it from McLaughlin, city rep and quit your whining. Whine whine whine. No secret document Get it yourself.

Anonymous said...

Like anyone could possible make up those numbers for a year end financial status or beginning of the year status. Who do "they" think they are kidding? Councils job not taxpayers.

Anonymous said...

if we're $12 million in the hole, then how are the police and firemen getting paid? are they taking IOUs?

Anonymous said...

fake professor.

fake citizens watchdog group.

fake documents.

fake conspiracy.

fake. fake. fake. fake. fake.

we can't see the professor.

we can't attend the meetings.

we can't meet the staff.

we can't see the documents.

we can't see the evidence.

it's all fake.

everything by denhart/CFA is fake.

Anonymous said...

prove me wrong.

let me meet the professor.

let the tribune interview the professor.

let me attend a CFA meeting.

let the tribune interview CFA's staff members.

let me see the documents.

let me see the evidence.

let me see ANYTHING other than an anonymous claim that, without evidence, looks like character assignation.

PROVE YOU ARE NOT ALL FAKE.

Anonymous said...

typo - character assassination.

Anonymous said...

This is directed to anonymous 3:37, you sure need some serious therphy. I'll pay for the first visit.

Anonymous said...

This is directed to anonymous 3:37, you sure need some serious therphy. I'll pay for the first visit.

Anonymous said...

This is directed to anonymous 3:37, you sure need some serious therphy. I'll pay for the first visit.

are you saying i can meet the professor?

are you saying i can attend a CFA meeting?

are you saying i can be emailed the document?

what are you saying?

what in that statement was wrong?

reply with something OTHER THAN an insult.

Anonymous said...

They must be seriously ill. I agree. The only thing is they don't recognize how they are. But that's the first sign.

Anonymous said...

They must be seriously ill. I agree. The only thing is they don't recognize how they are. But that's the first sign.

I hoped for facts. Verifiable facts. I got an insult. I'm not surprised.

When you're fake, and someone calls you out, the best response is to go on the attack.

Anonymous said...

FOS's new slogan:

"Insults, Not Facts!"

Anonymous said...

shirley it is a shame that there is one person on here who has taken your great blog and tried to turn it into nothing but an anti FOS blog. Most people are actually interested in helping this community. This person is obviously not one of them. Perhaps it is time to return this blog back to the "Voices of the PEOPLE" instead of voices of ONE anti FOS PERSON. Would you consider deleting repetitive postings by this one person?

Anonymous said...

As the family member of a person who has been repeatedly and wrongfully attacked, made fun of, ridiculed and harassed on this blog, I personally find the entire scope of its operation reprehensible.
Requiring persons to be responsible for what they post in no way diminished anyone’s First Amendment Rights. Freedom of speech, when one abuses it to only hide behind a mask of anonymity is more of an abuse of the First Amendment than requiring users to be responsible for the contents of what they post. The argument that there are those who can not publicly state what they feel does not hold water, if they respect their rights to free speech then that is a risk they must take.
Continued enabling of such abuse shows a lack of moral character, civic responsibility, and personal fortitude to stand up against what is obviously rampid vulgarities, slandering, and character assassination of anyone who disagrees with those who feel no one is correct but them. For the record, I do not have a Google account or open ID, and I do not desire to have one. Simply because I know these forums are nothing more than online romper rooms with collections of spoiled brats.

Anonymous said...

Would you consider deleting repetitive postings by this one person?

Next FOS strategy. If you cannot answer the questions, try censorship.

Shirley, if you want to get rid of anonymous posts, that's OK with me. We'll stop getting the anonymous "I have a letter saying $5 million hole in budget" posts too.

Anonymous said...

As the family member of a person who has been repeatedly and wrongfully attacked, made fun of, ridiculed and harassed on this blog.

Are you a family member of Mayor England? Or are you a family member of the fake professor? Which one is it?

Anonymous said...

Yeah, this guy does the same wierd thing to me and others every chance he gets. We all can see this stupid mind game being played, to see that it is narcissism-in action. It dispells any doubt that this jerk is indeed a narcissist trying to put down others by playong his same stupid game. Just ignore him.

Anonymous said...

anonymous posting should remain and shirley has stated her belief on this. she has already stated that she will not allow this one repetitive person or others to pursued her differently which we know he is trying to accomplish. she does reserve the rights to delete those repetitive comments and i encourage her to do just that.

Anonymous said...

3:45 if first you don't succeed try, try and try some more.
LMAO

Anonymous said...

ignore the fool, he wants your attention.

Anonymous said...

4:52 i am not with FOS so this is not a FOS strategy....this is a person who finds it sad that you are trying to destroy a blog that was designed to provide the citizens of our community a place to discus issues and concerns of our community. FOS is not an issue or concern on this blog it is only a concern of yours.

Anonymous said...

she does reserve the rights to delete those repetitive comments and i encourage her to do just that.

Do you mean the repetitive comments about England being corrupt or the repetitive comments about applauding our local "citizens watchdog group."

Anonymous said...

He must have forgotten to take his medication.

Anonymous said...

FOS is not an issue or concern on this blog it is only a concern of yours.

Someone doesn't like being asked to put up or shut up, do they? If you just showed him the documents you said you had, I bet he would have shut up.

Anonymous said...

He must have forgotten to take his medication.

Another insult. Your strategy is tiresome.

How about you back up what you said?

Forget FOS. Someone posted HERE, on THIS VERY BLOG, that the city general fund was $5.3 million in the hole. Someone posted HERE, on THIS VERY BLOG, that they had a letter from the state saying so.

All he's asking is for you to prove that the letter exists. You can email the letter. You can post the state's web address where the letter is. You can tell him the date the letter was published, by whom and what it's titled so he can call the state instead of going on a wild goose chance. Any of the above will work.

Why is that too much to ask?

Anonymous said...

Why is that too much to ask.

Answer the question instead of insulting the person asking the question.

If you have ANY PROOF AT ALL THAT THERE'S A LETTER, SHOW US.

Anonymous said...

I take anonymous's silence to mean that the city's finances are pretty good. Just like the state auditor said. Nothing illegal. Nothing terribly unusual.

Anonymous said...

5:17 a copy of the document has been left for you in the city controllers office ask for K she has is holding it for you.

Anonymous said...

email it. a47150@hotmail.com

Anonymous said...

i called kay earlier today. she didn't know what i was talking about.

Anonymous said...

5:26 I didn't get a call from you today.

Anonymous said...

Repetitive comments are one thing. Damaging and insulting comments for the sake of being cruel to people are not protected rights under the First Amendment. The person who runs this site should know that and would be wise to ask if they can be held civilly responsible for not deleting such comments.

Anonymous said...

6:13 the repetitive comments being made are damaging and insulting comments made for the sake of being cruel and for the sake of that one lonely man to get his daily jollies.

Anonymous said...

Whose feelings are being hurt? Is professor Erik crying?

Anonymous said...

So cruel and repetitive comments should be deleted?

Okay, delete all cruel and repetitive comments about:

- England
- Malysz
- Baylor
- Smith
- Gillenwater
- Cassady
- Drake.

Anonymous said...

Which comment was most cruel? The one where he asked to see the document proof or the one where he said CFA is fake?

Not exactly the most cruel things I've ever heard?

Anonymous said...

DOES OUR CITY COUNCIL LIVE IN NEW ALBANY?

OUR LOCAL NEWSPAPER IS CALLED THE
" NEW ALBANY TRIBUNE".

OUR CITY CONTROLLER PREPARED THE CITY "ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT" AS
REQUIRED BY LAW IN INDIANA.

THE 2009 END OF YEAR FINANCIAL REPORT WAS PUBLISHED ON MARCH 4, 2010 IN THE TRIBUNE ON PAGE B-4.

THIS FINANCIAL REPORT WAS ALMOST A FULL PAGE.

THE GENERAL FUND WAS LISTED AS
-$5,343,770.76. YES, THAT MINUS
SYMBOL MEANS, "IN THE HOLE".

IT ALSO MEANS THAT IF YOU ARE 5 MILLION IN THE HOLE ON DECEMBER 31, 2009, THEN,,, YOU START OUT
ON JANUARY 1, 2010 WITH $5 MILLION IN THE HOLE.

HOW CAN OUR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS BE
MAKING FINANCIAL DECISIONS IF THEY ARE NOT AWARE OF THE FINANCIAL CONDITION OF OUR CITY ? ? ?

Anonymous said...

SORRY-- CORRECTION ON DATE.

MARCH 5, 2010 PAGE B-4

Anonymous said...

yes, the general fund temporarily was in the hole. but that was because the state was slow in handing out tax money. to pay the bills, the city borrowed against another fund, tif i believe. once the state paid us our annual dough, the negative became a positive.

where's the crime?

Anonymous said...

That's not true. We have heard that excuse but it's not true.

You think it's a crime if we are $5 million in the hole? Will you talk w/ your council person and tell them that? Thanks.

Anonymous said...

You anonymous progressives who claim the city is in good shape and that the audit showed nothing needs to educate yourselves. You can say all you want but when it's in print you have no bases for your comments.

You want to blame anyone and everyone for the mismanagement and malfeasance.

Take your best shot at other blogs and citizen for accountability it doesn't matter what you say or think.

There still standing tall and proud of exposing this administration.

You attack the potty police, but they have been right all along.

Everyone is entitled to an opinion but NOT your facts.

This BS the money (taxes) hadn't been collected is nothing but garbage and you know it.

At least the educated ones know it!

What's Garry going to say?

Do any of you know anything about Budgets? Obviously NOT.

Do you not understand that State laws have been broken?

Do you know in 2007 the City Council past an ordinance (law)for Garry to seperate the sewer and sanitation money then and it only took her three years (if it's even been done) to do it.

No one in this city is above the law, not even the mayor and the illegal deputy mayor.

Example: after Baylor put up his wall for his brewhouse he had not gotten permission to place it there. When it came up on this blog he finally went before the BOW (after the fact) and did break the law.

Council voted two times for Linden Meadows to not receive free hook ups (once with Garner and then England) even the previous sewer board passed that NO one got free hook-ups. But then someone gave them free hook ups. You say NO big deal, how do we know the entire place isn't on free hooks up?

A thousand dollars here, ten thousand there still mounts up to big bucks.

If I get a parking ticket, why should I pay, when others are in the selective group who don't pay their sewer bills, permit fees and has a free ride all the time. People are tired of England's politics.

Now you wonder why our city is in the mess it's in.

Read the 2008 State of the Union address, read England's first and second audit report from the State Board of Accounts.

Then get your butts back on here and tell us we are all wrong.

Why should anyone on here do the work for you?

Btw: the SBOA have no legal authority but we do we have a right as taxpayers and citizens of New Albany to expose and bring forth before the council, ISP, prosecutor, Indiana State Attorney General, Governor and the Justice Department.

If the sky is blue you would argue it cloudy, you can't debate because you are to lazy to look at the real facts and then make everything personal when you can't debate.

So who's laughing now?

Anonymous said...

The family member to which I referred is definately not a member of any group.

The New Albanian said...

Example: after Baylor put up his wall for his brewhouse he had not gotten permission to place it there. When it came up on this blog he finally went before the BOW (after the fact) and did break the law.

This is inaccurate, and I've explained previously what really happened. I understand that forever more, anonymous bearers of malice will misrepresent things like this because they feel threatened by me. They shouldn't, but that's what makes the little people so very, very small: Cowardice.

Ernest said...

7:23: Who’s laughing now? We are, at you. Did you happen to listen to the news this morning about the Commonwealth of Kentucky's State Auditor talking about the fiscal Shape of Metro Louisville? Sounded just like our report, just in the red a hell of a lot more than we are, and guess what, just like here, no one in the state with the authority to launch and investigation feels its prudent to say that there has been criminal wrongdoing by the administration there. My biggest issue with you people is you claim to be community watchdogs, yet anytime anyone asked, whether they make themselves known or not, you refuse to share information, its just "get your own evidence". If you HAVE evidence, it belongs to the People of this city, the citizens who duly elect the officials you claim to have evidence against. It is not YOURS, it is NOT for the kudo point building of your groups political agenda. If you are with holding such documentation, that is for the good of the people because you have a grudge to bear against Baylor, Gillenwater, England, Drake, and Cassidy, then simple put, you are MORE corrupt than those you would cast accusations at. I politely asked by email to onevoice@aol.com, on here and elsewhere. I provided email addresses where I could be contacted, and it would appear to be the same for this person Alan. As for me, all I got in return for my serious inquiry and sincere concern was ridiculed by you people. The continued disingenuosity exhibited towards anyone who has sincere concerns, coupled with the unrelenting attacks regarding a 30' piece of sidewalk, local business owners, and anyone who believes we have a duty to leave our city a better place for future generations is both sickening as well as extremely frustrating.

Anonymous said...

My mailbox is still empty.

Alan
a47150@hotmail.com



You know, I'd really like to see this document. THE FULL DOCUMENT, NOT JUST ONE NUMBER. Reports like these always are full of footnotes. That's where the real story is, in the footnotes and similar references. Taking one number out of context is meaningless. Accounting is never as simple as one number.

I want to be clear. I am not saying the city's books are clean. I'm saying I have not yet seen proof one way or the other. If someone has evidence pointing one way or another, let's see it.

Anonymous said...

So who's laughing now?

I don't know. Who are you? Are you laughing? If so, it's sick that you find something funny in this.

Anonymous said...

how do we know the entire place isn't on free hooks up?

STOP THE PRESSES. Did fake-citizens watchdog just almost admit they don't know something? I that their staff of 30 carefully researched everything and knew everything. First time for everything.

You're right, you don't know. You don't know what you are talking about.

Anonymous said...

Btw: the SBOA have no legal authority but we do we have a right as taxpayers and citizens of New Albany to expose and bring forth before the council, ISP, prosecutor, Indiana State Attorney General, Governor and the Justice Department.

The ISP, prosecutors, Attorney General, Governor and Justice Dept. will all ask you for exactly the same thing that I'm asking for: PROOF.

If you got it, why aren't you sharing it?

If you don't, why are you making allegations you can't prove?

Anonymous said...

The family member to which I referred is definately not a member of any group.

Are you a fake cousin of the fake professor?

Or are you a fake uncle to one of the six fake marathon runners?

Anonymous said...

The CFA/FOS/Denhart objection to England has nothing to do with crime. It has nothing to do with accountability. It has nothing to do with fiscal management.

The CFA/FOS/Denhart objection is about one thing: Politics.

She doesn't like England's policies. She doesn't like his goals for the city. She takes every opportunity to attack him because she sees obstruction is the best way to achieve what she could not achieve at the ballot box.

So much for representational government. So much for listening to the voters. CFA/FOS/Denhart talk a good game but their actions, their baseless character assassination, she's she could care less about truth, transparency, citizen's rights, or democracy.

Anonymous said...

There are no footnotes on the annual report except to state who prepared it (Garry) and Sworn to.

You have been told where to get this report. Sorry you are not capable. This report can not be emailed. The report includes every department and every fund in the city.

Anonymous said...

This report can not be emailed.

You said you had a copy. Scan it and email it or post it to your website.

Also, you wrote that the state prepared the report. Now you say it was prepared by Kay.

Gee whiz. Wonder why I want to see it with my own eyes?

An accounting report with NO FOOTNOTES? You have to me #$%^ing kidding me. Doesn't sound like much of a report to me.

Anonymous said...

It there are no footnotes, it it's just a balance sheet, then it will NOT show money due to come in from the state.

Anonymous said...

12:10 yea dude you sound like you know a whole lot of nothing about government accounting and reporting.

ask your good friends Baylor, Gillenwater, England, Drake, and Cassidy <----- you) to get a copy of the document for you.

Anonymous said...

Duh, the State did not prepare the report. Attested to by Garry. Which part do you not comprehend?

The State has a copy at Department Local Government and Finance.

Auditor has a copy.

Controller has a copy.

The Tribune has it printed. Which part don't you understand?

Anonymous said...

Has England hired a gun to take care of the blogs? Tooo funny how ignorance shows trying to take care of their man.

Anonymous said...

The State has a copy at Department Local Government and Finance.

Auditor has a copy.

Controller has a copy.


Apparently everyone has a copy except for FOS.

Anonymous said...

All citizens have a copy if they follow the legals. Does that leave you out? You can't get away from the facts. The numbers were prepared by the City. No one in their right mind can say the stuff you are attempting to say. This blog is not FOS. The numbers were put on this blog. We don't care about FOS, only the shape OUR CITY is in. We have to think at this time whoever you are you DON'T CARE FOR YOUR TOWN'S WELLBEING.

Anonymous said...

you just don't listen, do you.

1. it's not just the numbers, it's the context. a number can mean anything. what did it mean in that report?

2. no one said this document didn't exists. the poster just said they want to see it with their own eyes.

why don't you get that?

Anonymous said...

obviously, police and fire are getting paid. money's coming from somewhere. if everything's millions in the hole, the city would be bankrupt. just saying "General fund $5.3 million in red" does not tell anything about what's going on. obviously people are still getting paid. there's money coming from somewhere. is it coming from the state? that's what people said. that makes sense to me. without knowing the full story, it sounds like someone might be trying to make a mountain out of a molehill.

Anonymous said...

12 days and still no arrest

tick
tock
tick
tock

Anonymous said...

Do the research, homework and put your legs in motion and get you a copy from numerous sources. Which part don't you understand.

So what people are getting paid? They got paid last year without any money. Your points are invalid. It's called robbing peter to pay paul. When they lay most of the city off what will you say then? I can't imagine.

Anonymous said...

11:57 keep telling yourself this crap and you might just get it. Who cares what you think?
I applaud our local citizens group for standing up for me and my family.
Don't you have a few chairs and tables to clean. Or is your business slow?

Anonymous said...

Money tight, maybe your momma has another $25,000 to loan you.

Anonymous said...

more lies, more slander, more insults.

that's the FOS way.

Anonymous said...

12 days and still no arrest

tick
tock
tick
tock


Did England personally promise you an arrest? What's your point? Are you sad there's no arrest.

Much a do about nothing.

Anonymous said...

No, NAC doesn't have a copy. God forbid he say anything against Sheriff England.
The bigger they are, the harder they fall. What ya going to do when England is removed from office?

Anonymous said...

Yeah England did promise an arrest. Weren't you at the Council?

Anonymous said...

shirley,
it's redistribution of wealth! why wouldn't you be on board with that?

Anonymous said...

No, NAC doesn't have a copy. God forbid he say anything against Sheriff England.
The bigger they are, the harder they fall. What ya going to do when England is removed from office?


What the heck are you talking about? No one said NAC had a copy. Stay on topic for a minute, can you?

Anonymous said...

It didn't even take twelve days to arrest David Camn and he killed three people.

The New Albanian said...

Sheriff England gave me a copy, but I loaned it to Doc Holliday, and he lost it in a poker game.

Anonymous said...

Get a copy from Daniel, New Albanian. He can retrieve the issue of the Tribune easily. I'm glad you think the city's finances are a joke. Typical, huh?

Anonymous said...

I'm glad you think the city's finances are a joke.

Since when it asking for evidence, reading footnotes, reviewing original source documents and asking for context "a joke." Since never.

Going on a crusade, pointing fingers when you don't understand the numbers, claiming documents say something they don't, making irresponsible allegations of criminal wrongdoing, THAT's a joke.

Anonymous said...

The sad thing is we do understand the numbers and it is obvious from the jokesters and whiners on here they don't. Go back to school along with Council members. Take the time but that's right you don't have the time.

Anonymous said...

3:13 no one said those five did they? Nope I'd say three outta five isn't bad.

Anonymous said...

Time for Shirley to start deleting the people who are muddying the waters about city business. If you won't educate yourself then get the hell out of the kitchen.

I can see a kid with a laptop sitting there on orders to watch this blog and make these stupid asanine comments. So sad people do not care to learn or do not care about this city. I do know know what citizens expect from people who will ignore the truth no matter what. How will it bite them? I don't care to imagine.

Anonymous said...

Here you go threstening again, haven't you learned I'm smart enough to have gotten the conversation on tape.

Gee Louise, give me some credit.

Anonymous said...

man, where does she ever fit all these secret tapes? must have a warehouse.

Anonymous said...

Ignorance is Bliss!!!!!!

Anonymous said...

4:33 the best place to have tapes is in a safe deposit box. You never know when you might need them.

LMAO

Anonymous said...

4:52, are these people really as dumb as we think they are?

They would never make the debating team would they?

You are so right. "Ignorance is Bliss!"

Anonymous said...

5-4 vote on $7.4 loan.

See, I told you so!

Anonymous said...

Contrary to what New Albanian has published McLaughlin passed out the year end report to ALL COUNCIL PERSONS. Obviously some do not understand what they have in their hands.

The New Albanian said...

Contrary to what New Albanian has published McLaughlin passed out the year end report to ALL COUNCIL PERSONS.

If so, then why is Pat my only option? Couldn't I ask my 3rd district uncouncilman, or did he throw it away?

Anonymous said...

To the folks that had the impression we were only responsible to pay interest on the parts of the 7.4 million dollar as we use it....Sorry, that is not correct:

The city is responsible for repaying the 7.4 million dollars over twenty years at 2.67% interest. This starts immediately because it is a part of a refi package that includes several old loans. Net result: The city will spend $2.6 million dollars to borrow the $7.4 million. It also cost the rate payers an additional $166,000 in misc. loan and lawyer fees. The sewer has now borrowed about $62 million. But what's important to know, is, it brings the new Annual Principal and Interest obligation of the Sewer Utility to $75,395,663.

Anonymous said...

Sure you can ask but I didn't think you spoke to him. He definitely has the report. Thank you for inquiring.

The New Albanian said...

Throughout this incredibly unproductive thread, it kept being repeated that to get the report, Pat must be asked.

Then it was said that all the council members have it. Why, then, the incessant reinforcement of Pat's role in all this?

Is it because he must be credited and congratulated for doing King Larry's bidding? Thank you for inquiring, etc, out monies, all that, grow room, you know.

Anonymous said...

We thought you liked Pat more than Steve. How would we know Steve was your Council person? Alan was the one writing. Keep on trying to figure out who is writing what. Like it's as important as the money we are speaking of (while I don't care who brings it up and who wants to talk about it). As long as the facts come to light, right?

The New Albanian said...

I live in the 3rd district.

Which means: I have no representation.

I don't waste time guessing about matters here, because it doesn't matter much. I just happen to be awake tonight.

Anonymous said...

To the New Albanian,

Maybe if you took the time to call Steve instead of criticizing and assuming he threw it away. Here's his number 941-9032.

Problem solved, see how easy that was?

Anonymous said...

This guy would never make it on the debate team. What a negative person, no wonder people on here thinks he's a jerk.

The New Albanian said...

Maybe if you took the time to call Steve instead of criticizing and assuming he threw it away. Here's his number 941-9032.

I tried, and some kid named Opie answered. WTF?

Anonymous said...

The New Albanianer writes:

"Throughout this incredibly unproductive thread...."

Hey, have you checked your threads lately?

What a hoot.

Anonymous said...

11:42, thank you for your profound contribution to this discussion.

Anonymous said...

I tried callin Steve but he was in Disney Land.

Anonymous said...

FOS really thinks the people that read these blogs are idiots.

Amazingly the VAT explanation that Evan Bayh gave directly to the "staff" comes verbatim from several other sources before and after their "meeting".

*phony professors
*phony staff
*phony meetings
*Marathoners

seems like a pattern to me

Anonymous said...

Yawn

Anonymous said...

3:51 nope...they like the rest of us know you are an idiot.

Anonymous said...

1:33, creative!

(sarcasm...and yes i think i need to point that out to YOU).

Anonymous said...

7:00 pm - no sarcasim just trueism